#noindex
pagename TBD, 후보들은 { 통사 구문 통사론 구문론 }
 [[구문,syntax]] ... Srch:구문

대충
구문/통사: 언어표현의 구조 및 그 구조에 대한 각종 규칙들... 어떤 [[문장,sentence]]은 허락되고/옳고, 어떤 건 왜 아닌가? 이런거.
 기계적인/수학적인 구조/규칙에 주목한다. [[의미,meaning]]까지 주목하지는 않는다. 의미까지 생각하는 것은 [[시맨틱스,semantics]].([[의미,semantics]] or [[의미론,semantics]] etc.)
-론 을 붙이면 그걸 대루는 학문 이름.


Compare: [[문법,grammar]]
''PL에선 syntax를 문법으로 번역하는 경우가 많은데... 이유가?? [[문법,syntax]] page mk?''
 참고: [[문법,grammar]]페이지 맨 위 ...에 따르면 '''syntax'''의 [[명세,specification]]가 grammar.

밀접+MKL
[[기호학,semiotics]]
[[기호,symbol]] - curr [[심벌,symbol]]
[[언어,language]]
[[언어학,linguistics]]
[[문장,sentence]]
[[단어,word]]
[[컴파일러,compiler]]

----
<<tableofcontents>>
= Sub =

[[abstract_syntax]] =,abstract_syntax =,abstract_syntax . abstract_syntax
{
추상

Sub:
AST abstract_syntax_tree { https://foldoc.org/abstract+syntax+tree }
first-order_abstract_syntax (FOAS) 
higher-order_abstract_syntax (HOAS) { [[WpEn:Higher-order_abstract_syntax]] = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higher-order_abstract_syntax }
ASN.1 { WpEn:ASN.1 }


https://foldoc.org/abstract+syntax

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/抽象構文

[[WpEn:Abstract_syntax]]
= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_syntax
 first-order_abstract_syntax (FOAS)와 ''- if: structure는 추상적이나 names(identifiers) are still concrete (그래서 [[name_resolution]]이 필요)''
 higher-order_abstract_syntax (HOAS?)로 나뉨. ''- if: the names themselves are abstract''

"abstract syntax"
}

/// 위와 반대?
[[concrete_syntax]] =,concrete_syntax =,concrete_syntax . concrete_syntax
{
WpEn:Concrete_syntax redir to WpEn:Parse_tree ([[Date(2023-07-20T19:21:27)]])
... Google:concrete.syntax Google:concrete+abstract+syntax
}
[[metasyntax]] =,metasyntax =,metasyntax . metasyntax
{
다른 syntax를 기술하기 위한 syntax.

'syntax에 대한 syntax', hence the name.


Sub:
BNF 등. // [[metasyntax_notation]] ie [[표기법,notation]].
 Srch:BNF

rel. [[metasyntactic_variable]] { https://foldoc.org/metasyntactic+variable [[변수,variable]] }

WtEn:metasyntax ? jjjjjjj

https://foldoc.org/metasyntax
Up: [[메타,meta]] [[syntax]]( curr [[신택스,syntax]] )
}
[[concrete_syntax]]
{
source_code 얘기. DEL OK
https://foldoc.org/concrete+syntax
... Google:concrete+syntax
}
[[transfer_syntax]]
{
network transmission 얘기. DEL OK
https://foldoc.org/transfer+syntax
... Google:transfer+syntax
}
[[syntactic_sugar]]
{
https://foldoc.org/syntactic+sugar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_sugar
}
[[syntactic_salt]]
{
https://foldoc.org/syntactic+salt
}

[[syntactic_structure]]
{
mklink
[[구조,structure]]?
[[mathematical_linguistics]]

https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/Syntactic_structure
}

[[syntactic_category]] =,syntactic_category =,syntactic_category . syntactic_category
{
WtEn:syntactic_category
WpSp:Syntactic_category ?
WpEn:Syntactic_category
}

= Cmp =
Cmp: [[시맨틱스,semantics]]

= Bmks =
4mld
Syntax Soup
http://xahlee.info/comp/syntax_soup_index.html

= Twins =
[[WpKo:신택스]]
= https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/신택스

[[WpEn:Syntax_(disambiguation)]]
 = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntax_%28disambiguation%29

// [[논리,logic]] [[논리학,logic]] [[형식언어,formal_language]] [[형식체계,formal_system]] - 의 syntax:
[[WpEn:Syntax_(logic)]] 
 = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntax_(logic)
 = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntax_%28logic%29

[[WpKo:통사론]]
 = https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/통사론
 "'''통사론'''(syntax) 또는 '''구문론''' ... '''문장론''' 또는 '''어법학''' 또는 '''문법론''' 등으로 불린다"

[[WpSimple:Syntax]]
 = https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntax

https://foldoc.org/syntax
{
주어진 [[언어,language]]에서, [[문법,grammar]]으로 기술된(described), 옳은(valid) [[문자열,string]]의 [[구조,structure]].
언어의 [[의미,meaning]]는 [[semantics]]에 의해 주어짐.
}

https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definition:Syntax (짧음: 그냥 언어의 syntax는 그것의 [[구조,structure]]라는 서술)

WtEn:syntax
 = https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/syntax

https://everything2.com/title/Syntax

http://emal.iptime.org/noriwiki/index.php/Syntax

https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/syntax
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/syntax+%28linguistics%29
##https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/syntax+(linguistics)